From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Folino v. Town of Niagara

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Sep 29, 2008
07-CV-407 (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2008)

Summary

denying summary judgment on plaintiffs' excessive force claim even though plaintiffs had pled guilty to disorderly conduct and state court had determined that there was probable cause for their arrest

Summary of this case from Hayes v. Cnty. of Sullivan

Opinion

07-CV-407.

September 29, 2008


ORDER


This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), on August 7, 2007. On October 16, 2007, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. On June 11, 2008, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendants' motion be granted in part and denied in part.

Defendants filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on June 19, 2008, and plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se, filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on July 11, 2008. Defendants filed a response to plaintiffs' objections on July 30, 2008., and plaintiffs filed a response to defendants' objections on July 31, 2008. Oral argument on the objections was held on August 28, 2008.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. Upon a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and after reviewing the submissions and hearing argument from the parties, the Court adopts the proposed findings of the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation, the Court: (1) grants defendants' motion for summary judgment as to plaintiffs' claims of false arrest/illegal seizure, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution; (2) denies defendants' motion for summary judgment as to plaintiffs' claims of excessive force against defendants Spears, Soluri and Cloutier; and (3) grants defendants' motion for summary judgment as to defendants Suitor, Teixeira, the Town of Niagara, Niagara Town Court and the Town of Niagara Police Department. Thus, the only claims remaining in the case are plaintiffs' claims of excessive force against defendants Spears, Soluri and Cloutier.

The parties shall appear on December 12, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. for a meeting to set a trial date.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Folino v. Town of Niagara

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Sep 29, 2008
07-CV-407 (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2008)

denying summary judgment on plaintiffs' excessive force claim even though plaintiffs had pled guilty to disorderly conduct and state court had determined that there was probable cause for their arrest

Summary of this case from Hayes v. Cnty. of Sullivan

dismissing claim against judicial officer under absolute judicial immunity, even accepting as true plaintiff's allegations that officer was "hostile and biased"

Summary of this case from Rios v. Third Precinct Bay Shore
Case details for

Folino v. Town of Niagara

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY J. FOLINO and PETER D. OLIVIERI, Plaintiffs, v. THE TOWN OF…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Sep 29, 2008

Citations

07-CV-407 (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

Rios v. Third Precinct Bay Shore

see also Montero v. Travis, 171 F.3d 757, 761 (2d Cir. 1999) (claim for injunctive relief barred against…

Hayes v. Cnty. of Sullivan

While Plaintiff's guilty plea bars his false arrest claim, “a guilty plea does not necessarily preclude a…