Opinion
March 5, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Ira Gammerman, J.
Petitioner, Thomas Foley, a court stenographer with over thirty-five (35) years experience in both the private and public sector, entered the Unified Court System in September 1983 as a senior court reporter. By all accounts petitioner's employment was soon fraught with tension between him and his immediate supervisors.
Substantial evidence supports respondent's determination that despite frequent warnings and counselling from supervisors, petitioner failed to produce transcripts in a timely manner and meet the minimum page production requirements set forth in the standards promulgated by the Office of Court Administration. Nor was the penalty of dismissal excessive in the circumstances presented (see, Matter of Short v Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn., 45 N.Y.2d 721).
The Hearing Officer's exclusion of the "log sheets" of other court reporters proffered by petitioner was proper, there being no genuine issue of selective discriminatory enforcement (see, Matter of Feigman v Klepak, 62 A.D.2d 816). Petitioner was afforded the full panoply of due process rights to which he was entitled, and the charges were sufficient to enable him to adequately prepare, defend and be heard (Matter of Fitzgerald v Libous, 44 N.Y.2d 660).
Concur — Carro, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Smith, JJ.