From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foley v. Flushing Hospital Medical Center

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 26, 1974
316 N.E.2d 579 (N.Y. 1974)

Opinion

Argued June 4, 1974

Decided June 26, 1974

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN J. LEAHY, J.

Joseph P. Napoli, Harry H. Lipsig and Joseph B. Castleman for appellant.

E. Richard Rimmels, Jr. for Flushing Hospital and Medical Center, respondent.

Arnold Davis for Frank Labriola and another, respondents.


Order reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, in the following memorandum: Plaintiff made out a prima facie case as to all defendants sufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss and hence the Court of Appeals reverses. In doing so, there is, of course, no evaluation of the merits of the case. Moreover, also requiring reversal is the restriction of the examination of plaintiff's expert witness (see the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice J. IRWIN SHAPIRO at the Appellate Division).

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and STEVENS. Taking no part: Judge RABIN.


Summaries of

Foley v. Flushing Hospital Medical Center

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 26, 1974
316 N.E.2d 579 (N.Y. 1974)
Case details for

Foley v. Flushing Hospital Medical Center

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD FOLEY, an Infant, by His Parent JOHN FOLEY, Appellant, v. FLUSHING…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 26, 1974

Citations

316 N.E.2d 579 (N.Y. 1974)
316 N.E.2d 579
359 N.Y.S.2d 113

Citing Cases

Fryer v. Maimonides Medical Center

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the appellant's contention, the plaintiff adduced…

Day v. Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the defendants' contention, the plaintiffs…