From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Florists' Nationwide Tel. v. Florists' Tel. Del

U.S.
May 15, 1967
387 U.S. 909 (1967)

Summary

stating that complaint allegations are mere accusations, not evidence

Summary of this case from In Matter of Morgan Group, Inc. (Bankr.N.D.Ind. 2005)

Opinion

Nos. 1132, 1248.

May 15, 1967.


ORDERS.

C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. Thomas C. McConnell and Francis J. McConnell for petitioner in No. 1132 and for respondent in No. 1248. Norman Diamond and Melville C. Williams for petitioner in No. 1248 and for respondent in No. 1132. Reported below: 371 F. 2d 263.


Summaries of

Florists' Nationwide Tel. v. Florists' Tel. Del

U.S.
May 15, 1967
387 U.S. 909 (1967)

stating that complaint allegations are mere accusations, not evidence

Summary of this case from In Matter of Morgan Group, Inc. (Bankr.N.D.Ind. 2005)
Case details for

Florists' Nationwide Tel. v. Florists' Tel. Del

Case Details

Full title:FLORISTS' NATIONWIDE TELEPHONE DELIVERY NETWORK — AMERICA'S PHONE-ORDER…

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 15, 1967

Citations

387 U.S. 909 (1967)

Citing Cases

Matter of Levy

(footnote omitted). In National Boulevard Bank of Chicago v. Drive-In Development Corp. (In re Drive-In…

Beard v. Mitchell

A party does have a general right to have instructions presenting his theory of the case. Florists'…