From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Rouse

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 28, 1967
195 So. 2d 611 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Opinion

No. 64-990.

February 28, 1967.

Appeal from Circuit Court for Dade County; Henry L. Balaban, Judge.

Bolles, Goodwin Ryskamp, Miami, for appellant.

Nichols, Gaither, Beckham, Colson, Spence Hicks, Horton Schwartz, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C.J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.


ORDER ON MANDATE


Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on October 12, 1965 ( 178 So.2d 882) affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court's judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment dated January 9, 1967 ( 194 So.2d 260) and mandate dated February 14, 1967 now lodged in this court, quashed this court's judgment, without prejudice, and remanded the cause with directions to remand for a new trial;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on October 25, 1965 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court entered on October 12, 1965 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the judgment of the Circuit Court appealed from in this cause is reversed and the cause is remanded for new trial. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).


Summaries of

Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Rouse

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 28, 1967
195 So. 2d 611 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)
Case details for

Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Rouse

Case Details

Full title:FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 28, 1967

Citations

195 So. 2d 611 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Accordingly, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.…