From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Haberman

Supreme Court of Texas
Mar 7, 1996
915 S.W.2d 477 (Tex. 1996)

Summary

holding notice of lis pendens was improper because "plaintiffs seek a constructive trust ... only to satisfy the judgment they seek against" the defendant, which "is no more than a collateral interest in the property"

Summary of this case from In re TM Vill., Ltd.

Opinion

No. 95-0597.

August 1, 1995. Rehearing Overruled March 7, 1996.

Paul T. Curl, San Antonio, S. Mark Murray, San Antonio, for relator.

Robert E. Barger, San Antonio, Royal D. Adams, San Antonio, Karl E. Hays, San Antonio, Oliver S. Heard, Jr., San Antonio, Clifton F. Douglass, III, San Antonio, for respondent.


This mandamus concerns the propriety of notices to file lis pendens. Because the interest asserted by the real parties in interest is not one articulated in Texas Property Code s 12.007(a), we conditionally grant the writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to cancel the notices of lis pendens.

Plaintiffs brought a suit for conversion against Flores. They alleged that he converted property and used the proceeds to buy certain other properties. In their petition, they sought the imposition of a constructive trust on the property. They filed notices of lis pendens on the purchased properties, and sought to have a constructive trust placed on those properties.

A party may file a lis pendens during the pendency of an action involving: 1) title to real property, 2) the establishment of an interest in real property, or 3) the enforcement of an encumbrance against real property. TEX.PROP.CODE § 12.007(a). In the present case, the plaintiffs seek a constructive trust in the purchased properties only to satisfy the judgment they seek against Flores. As such, the interest is no more than a collateral interest in the property. Moss v. Tennant, 722 S.W.2d 762, 763 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, orig. proceeding). Therefore the notices of lis pendens are improper.

Without hearing oral argument, a majority of this Court conditionally grants the petition for mandamus directing the district judge to cancel the notices of lis pendens and vacate the earlier order refusing to cancel the notices of lis pendens. TEX.R.APP.P. 122.


Summaries of

Flores v. Haberman

Supreme Court of Texas
Mar 7, 1996
915 S.W.2d 477 (Tex. 1996)

holding notice of lis pendens was improper because "plaintiffs seek a constructive trust ... only to satisfy the judgment they seek against" the defendant, which "is no more than a collateral interest in the property"

Summary of this case from In re TM Vill., Ltd.

holding notice of lis pendens was improper because "plaintiffs seek a constructive trust in the purchased properties only to satisfy the judgment they seek against" the defendant, which "is no more than a collateral interest in the property"

Summary of this case from In re Cohen

holding that if the plaintiffs seek a constructive trust only to satisfy a judgment that they might obtain against the defendant, "the interest is no more than a collateral interest in the property," and the lis pendens is void

Summary of this case from In re Collins

holding that notice of lis pendens was improper because plaintiffs sought a constructive trust on property only to satisfy their judgment against defendant

Summary of this case from In re Wolf

holding that notice of lis pendens was improper because plaintiffs sought a constructive trust on property to satisfy their judgment against defendant

Summary of this case from Mangione v. Jaffe

granting mandamus relief from trial court's erroneously denial of motion to cancel notice of lis pendens without analysis of adequate remedy by appeal

Summary of this case from Cohen v. Sandcastle Homes, Inc.

granting mandamus relief from trial court's erroneously denial of motion to cancel notice of lis pendens without analysis of adequate remedy by appeal

Summary of this case from Cohen v. Sandcastle Homes, Inc.

granting mandamus relief from trial court's erroneously denial of motion to cancel notice of lis pendens without analysis of adequate remedy by appeal

Summary of this case from Cohen v. Sandcastle Homes, Inc.

directing trial court to vacate lis pendens, where "plaintiffs seek a constructive trust in the purchased properties only to satisfy the judgment they seek against [defendant]"

Summary of this case from Stewart Title Guaranty Company v. Sanford Title Services

issuing writ of mandamus directing the trial court to cancel notice of lis pendens where the underlying lawsuit sought a constructive trust on property in satisfaction of a judgment plaintiffs sought against defendant because the suit claimed only a collateral interest in the property

Summary of this case from Maniatis v. SLF IV 114 Assemblage, L.P.

In Flores, the Texas Supreme Court was confronted with a suit for conversion in which the plaintiffs sought to impose a constructive trust on the property.

Summary of this case from Century Marine v. Vaglica
Case details for

Flores v. Haberman

Case Details

Full title:Santos M. FLORES, M.D., Relator, v. The Honorable Carol R. HABERMAN…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Mar 7, 1996

Citations

915 S.W.2d 477 (Tex. 1996)

Citing Cases

Rivera v. Swaminarayan Gurukul-U.S., A Tex. Corp.

"A party may file a lis pendens during the pendency of an action involving: 1) title to real property, 2) the…

In re GMAC Mortgage

In conjunction with its suit, Taylor Investments filed a notice of lis pendens on the real property owned by…