holding that claims administrator not entitled to deferential standard of review, but had burden to prove that its decision was not tainted by self-interest
Summary of this case from Cochran v. Trans-General Life Ins. Co.No. 94-1674.
May 22, 1995, October TERM, 1994.
C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 41 F. 3d 1476.
holding that claims administrator not entitled to deferential standard of review, but had burden to prove that its decision was not tainted by self-interest
Summary of this case from Cochran v. Trans-General Life Ins. Co.Full title:FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE NURSING SERVICE, INC. v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF…
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 22, 1995
A plaintiff establishes a prima facie case of religious discrimination resulting from an employer's failure…
Waschak v. Acuity Brands, Inc. Senior Management BenefitSee Florence Nightingale Nursing Service, Inc. v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Alabama, 41 F.3d 1476, 1485 (11th…