From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flemington Natl. Bk. Tr. Co. v. Domler Leasing Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 11, 1979
48 N.Y.2d 678 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Argued September 11, 1979

Decided October 11, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MANUEL A. GOMEZ, J.

Jeffrey N. Rich and Richard S. Feldman for appellant.

Arthur Karger and David Abramowitz for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the majority at the Appellate Division, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice VINCENT A. LUPIANO, that Domler's obligation under the repurchase agreement did not extend to the Roselle-Twintex lease which had been assigned by Yegen to appellant bank more than two months prior to the execution of the repurchase agreement.

We find it unnecessary to reach or consider other issues.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Flemington Natl. Bk. Tr. Co. v. Domler Leasing Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 11, 1979
48 N.Y.2d 678 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

Flemington Natl. Bk. Tr. Co. v. Domler Leasing Corp.

Case Details

Full title:FLEMINGTON NATIONAL BANK TRUST COMPANY (N.A.), Appellant, v. DOMLER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 11, 1979

Citations

48 N.Y.2d 678 (N.Y. 1979)
421 N.Y.S.2d 881
397 N.E.2d 393

Citing Cases

Weisenfeld v. Iskander

Virtually all of the investors in the project had invested previously in Iskander/Bishay projects. Only one…

Village Sav. Bank v. Caplan

Thus, where the intent must be determined by disputed evidence or inferences outside the written record of…