From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flatbush Auto Discount Corp. v. Reich

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 11, 1947
190 Misc. 817 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)

Opinion

December 11, 1947.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, LAZARUS, J.

Paul Bank for appellants.

Irving G. Schleimer for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


The court was without jurisdiction to enter the judgment herein because the statement on which it was based was not verified by defendants or either of them, pursuant to the provisions of section 541 of the Civil Practice Act. The judgment was void and should have been vacated ( Starck Piano Co. v. O'Keefe, 211 A.D. 700, 702). Laches does not defeat a motion to vacate a judgment which is a nullity.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.

HAMMER, HOFSTADTER and HECHT, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Flatbush Auto Discount Corp. v. Reich

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 11, 1947
190 Misc. 817 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)
Case details for

Flatbush Auto Discount Corp. v. Reich

Case Details

Full title:FLATBUSH AUTO DISCOUNT CORP., Respondent, v. FRANK I. REICH et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1947

Citations

190 Misc. 817 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)
75 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

Detzel v. Detzel

If the defendant was never served in the action brought by her husband and never entered an appearance…

Cohen v. Ryan

The burden of proving that the arrangement for compensation was fair and reasonable and fully comprehended by…