From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flagship Products, Ltd. v. J.P. Stevens Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
May 21, 1975
313 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 1975)

Opinion

No. 46307.

May 21, 1975.

Petition and Cross-Petition for Writs of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, First District.

Davisson F. Dunlap, Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith Cutler, Orlando, and Ellis E. Neder, Jr., Jacksonville, for petitioner, cross-respondent.

James E. Hodge, Jones Foerster Hodge, Jacksonville, for respondent, cross-petitioner.


The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further careful consideration of the matter, the briefs and record, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution (1973). Accordingly, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C.J., ROBERTS, BOYD and ENGLAND, JJ., and MUSZYNSKI, Circuit Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Flagship Products, Ltd. v. J.P. Stevens Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
May 21, 1975
313 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 1975)
Case details for

Flagship Products, Ltd. v. J.P. Stevens Co.

Case Details

Full title:FLAGSHIP PRODUCTS, LTD., A CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. J.P. STEVENS CO.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 21, 1975

Citations

313 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 1975)

Citing Cases

Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney v. 100 Oak St.

Although this language is not as broad as that considered in Prima Paint other cases have found allegations…