From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitzmaurice v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 19, 1992
593 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 90-3342.

February 19, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Richard L. Oftedal, J.

Daniel M. Bachi and Shirley J. McEachern of Sellars, Supran, Cole, Marion Espy, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants/cross appellees.

Daniel H. Jones of Jones Wade, West Palm Beach, for appellee/cross appellant.


We find no error in the trial court's entry of a directed verdict in favor of appellee on appellants' affirmative defense of comparative negligence. We also find no error in the trial court's exclusion of Exhibit 6, a redacted version of a workers compensation claim report. Therefore, we affirm as to appellants' points on appeal.

We reverse, however, and remand this case for a new trial on all issues of damages. The trial court apparently concluded that the jury failed to award appellee adequate damages. Thereupon, it sua sponte ordered an additur in the amount of $6,500, or in the alternative, a new trial on damages. Section 768.74, Florida Statutes (1987), permits a trial court ". . . upon proper motion, to review the amount of such award to determine if such amount is excessive or inadequate. . . ." and to ". . . order a remittitur or additur as the case may be." (emphasis added). We hold that the trial court erred when it granted an additur in the absence of a motion by appellee for such relief.

Accordingly, we affirm the verdict and judgment on liability in favor of appellee and reverse and remand this case for a new trial on damages.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

LETTS, DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fitzmaurice v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 19, 1992
593 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Fitzmaurice v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM R. FITZMAURICE AND MARILYN FITZMAURICE, APPELLANTS/CROSS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 19, 1992

Citations

593 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Aurbach v. Gallina

However, the only pleading requirement in section 768.74 is that a "proper motion" be made for remittitur and…