Opinion
December, 1920.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except De Angelis and Hubbs, JJ., who dissent upon the ground that it appears affirmatively that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Fitch v. New York Central Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1920
194 App. Div. 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Summaries of
Fitch v. New York Central Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1920
194 App. Div. 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for
Fitch v. New York Central Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:ROY S. FITCH, Respondent, v. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1920
Citations
194 App. Div. 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Citing Cases
Kapros v. Pierce Oil Corp.
These facts made a prima-facie showing of negligence on defendant's part under the res ipsa loquitur theory,…
G. TRUNK R.R. CO. v. RICHARDSON ET ALUpon principle, this would seem to be the true doctrine; and it is supported by most, if not all, of the…