Opinion
Argued April 10, 1896
Decided April 28, 1896
Robert E. Deyo for appellant.
Christopher Fine for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except VANN, J., not voting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Fisher v. Rankin
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 28, 1896
149 N.Y. 579 (N.Y. 1896)
Summaries of
Fisher v. Rankin
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 28, 1896
149 N.Y. 579 (N.Y. 1896)
Case details for
Fisher v. Rankin
Case Details
Full title:ELIZABETH FISHER, Respondent, v . WILLIAM RANKIN, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 28, 1896
Citations
149 N.Y. 579 (N.Y. 1896)
Citing Cases
Moniot v. Jackson
Again, we are clearly of the opinion that no recovery should have been permitted for the nuisance, as was…
Treadwell v. City of YonkersBut the defendant was protected from such attack by civil action against the plan (authorities, supra) unless…