From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. O'Brien

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 21, 2009
333 F. App'x 748 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-7095.

Submitted: October 15, 2009.

Decided: October 21, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00569-GEC-MFU).

Chad S. Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Chad S. Fisher, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fisher v. O'Brien, No. 7:08-cv-00569-GEC-MFU, 2009 WL 1382385 (W.D.Va. May 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Fisher v. O'Brien

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 21, 2009
333 F. App'x 748 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Fisher v. O'Brien

Case Details

Full title:Chad S. FISHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry O'BRIEN, Respondent…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 21, 2009

Citations

333 F. App'x 748 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Payne v. Reed

on Metal Co., 39 S.W.2d 369; Bernheimer v. Scott, 228 S.W. 523; Hogue v. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. Co., 20 S.W.2d…

Whitworth v. Riley

In support of his contentions, defendant relies on cases which in effect lay down the rule that a person is…