From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1915
80 S.E. 1118 (N.C. 1915)

Opinion

(Filed 13 December, 1915.)

APPEAL by plaintiff from Long, J., at October Term, 1912, of SWAIN.

F. C. Fisher for plaintiff.

Frye, Gantt Frye, W. L. Taylor, and Bryson Black for defendant.


Civil action tried upon this issue:

1. Did the female plaintiff and defendant corporation make the contract as alleged in the fifth allegation of the first cause of action of the complaint? Answer: No.

The plaintiff appealed.


When this appeal was before us at last term the plaintiff (382) was granted a certiorari to bring up a corrected case on appeal. This is now before us in a very imperfect form, consisting practically of a copy of the judge's notes of the evidence.

Nevertheless, we have considered what purports to be the plaintiff's exceptions. We find them to be without merit. The controversy appears to be one almost exclusively of fact, and is settled by the finding of the jury.

No error.


Summaries of

Fisher v. Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1915
80 S.E. 1118 (N.C. 1915)
Case details for

Fisher v. Lumber Co.

Case Details

Full title:F. C. FISHER v. MONTVALE LUMBER COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1915

Citations

80 S.E. 1118 (N.C. 1915)
164 N.C. 381

Citing Cases

McDowell v. Kent

Affirmed. Cited: Wheeler v. Cole, 164 N.C. 381; Porter v. Lumber Co., ibid., 398; Carter v. Reaves, 167 N.C.…

Hobbs v. Cashwell

Appeal dismissed. Cited: Wheeler v. Cole, 164 N.C. 381; Carter v. Reaves, 167 N.C. 133.…