From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fischler v. McCarthy

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 20, 1954
218 F.2d 164 (2d Cir. 1954)

Summary

In Fischler v. McCarthy, 218 F.2d 164 (2 Cir., 1954) the circuit court sustained the district court's dismissal for lack of venue.

Summary of this case from Jordan v. Hutcheson

Opinion

No. 31, Docket 23101.

Argued December 7, 1954.

Decided December 20, 1954.

Harry Green, New York City (Samuel A. Bloom, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Alfred P. O'Hara, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Daniel G. Buckley, J. Edward Lumbard, U.S. Atty., and Thomas A. Bolan, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges.


The dismissal is affirmed for lack of venue in the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b); Butterworth v. Hill, 114 U.S. 128, 5 S.Ct. 796, 29 L.Ed. 119; and the opinion of Judge Kaufman below as reported in D.C.S.D.N.Y., 117 F. Supp. 643, at pages 646-647.


Summaries of

Fischler v. McCarthy

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 20, 1954
218 F.2d 164 (2d Cir. 1954)

In Fischler v. McCarthy, 218 F.2d 164 (2 Cir., 1954) the circuit court sustained the district court's dismissal for lack of venue.

Summary of this case from Jordan v. Hutcheson
Case details for

Fischler v. McCarthy

Case Details

Full title:Albert FISCHLER and William Saltzman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph R…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Dec 20, 1954

Citations

218 F.2d 164 (2d Cir. 1954)

Citing Cases

Jordan v. Hutcheson

In Mins v. McCarthy, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 220, 209 F.2d 307 (1953) a per curiam opinion held that the court would…