From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fischer v. Fischer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 25, 2004
882 So. 2d 435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 3D04-427.

August 25, 2004.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas S. Wilson, Jr., Judge.

Simon Schindler Sandberg, and Steven J. Silverman, for Appellant.

Leinoff Lemos, and Andrew Leinoff, and Ansana D. Singh, for Appellee.

Before GREEN, RAMIREZ, and SHEPHERD, JJ.


Affirmed. See Cole v. Cole, 723 So.2d 925, 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Marrone v. Miami Nat'l Bank, 507 So.2d 652, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Appellee Kenneth C. Fischer's motion for attorney's fees and costs on appeal is remanded to the trial court. If the movant establishes his entitlement pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes, and Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1997), the trial court is authorized to award the movant all or a portion of the reasonable appellate attorney's fees. This court concludes that the appeal by the wife lacked merit, and therefore the trial court should give great weight to the factors set forth in Rosen. See Rados v. Rados, 791 So.2d 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

We therefore affirm the order on appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to determine Kenneth C. Fischer's motion for attorney's fees and costs.


Summaries of

Fischer v. Fischer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 25, 2004
882 So. 2d 435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Fischer v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:Dianne FISCHER, etc., Appellant, v. Kenneth C. FISCHER, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 25, 2004

Citations

882 So. 2d 435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Randall v. Randall

When the Court determines otherwise, its order says so. See Fischer v. Fischer, 882 So.2d 435, 435 (Fla. 3d…

Armstrong v. Armstrong

Upon consideration of the renewed and amended motion for appellate attorney's fees filed by appellee, it is…