From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

First S. Nat'l Bank v. Sunnyslope Hous. Ltd. P'ship (In re Sunnyslope Hous. Ltd. P'ship)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sep 22, 2016
838 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016)

Summary

concluding that Proposition 47 "does not undermine a prior conviction's felony-status for purposes of § 841"

Summary of this case from United States v. London

Opinion

No. 12-17241 No. 12-17327 No. 13-16164 No. 13-16180

09-22-2016

In re: Sunnyslope Housing Limited Partnership, Debtor, First Southern National Bank, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Sunnyslope Housing Limited Partnership, Defendant–Appellee. In re: Sunnyslope Housing Limited Partnership, Debtor, Sunnyslope Housing Limited Partnership, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. First Southern National Bank, Defendant–Appellee. In re: Sunnyslope Housing Limited Partnership, Debtor, First Southern National Bank, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Sunnyslope Housing LP, Defendant–Appellee. In re: Sunnyslope Housing Limited Partnership, Debtor, Sunnyslope Housing LP, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. First Southern National Bank, Defendant–Appellee.

Brian Sirower, Attorney, Quarles & Brady LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Scott R. Goldberg, Esquire, Mark C. Hudson, Esquire, Dale Schian, Attorneys, Schian Walker, P.L.C., Phoenix, AZ, Edward King Poor, Attorney, Quarles & Brady LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Scott B. Cohen, David William Engelman, Bradley D. Pack, Patrick Clisham, Attorneys, Engelman Berger, PC, Phoenix, AZ, Susan Freeman, Attorney, Justin Henderson, Henk Taylor, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant–Appellee.


Brian Sirower, Attorney, Quarles & Brady LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Scott R. Goldberg, Esquire, Mark C. Hudson, Esquire, Dale Schian, Attorneys, Schian Walker, P.L.C., Phoenix, AZ, Edward King Poor, Attorney, Quarles & Brady LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff–Appellant.

Scott B. Cohen, David William Engelman, Bradley D. Pack, Patrick Clisham, Attorneys, Engelman Berger, PC, Phoenix, AZ, Susan Freeman, Attorney, Justin Henderson, Henk Taylor, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant–Appellee.

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

First S. Nat'l Bank v. Sunnyslope Hous. Ltd. P'ship (In re Sunnyslope Hous. Ltd. P'ship)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sep 22, 2016
838 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016)

concluding that Proposition 47 "does not undermine a prior conviction's felony-status for purposes of § 841"

Summary of this case from United States v. London
Case details for

First S. Nat'l Bank v. Sunnyslope Hous. Ltd. P'ship (In re Sunnyslope Hous. Ltd. P'ship)

Case Details

Full title:In re: Sunnyslope Housing Limited Partnership, Debtor, First Southern…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Sep 22, 2016

Citations

838 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016)

Citing Cases

United States v. London

Because the subsequent reclassification of London's California conviction had no bearing on that conviction's…

First S. Nat'l Bank v. Sunnyslope Hous. Ltd. (In re Sunnyslope Hous. Ltd.)

A majority of the active judges of this court voted to grant Sunnyslope's petition for rehearing en banc, and…