From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

First Nat'l Bank of Oakland v. Wolff

Supreme Court of California
May 25, 1889
79 Cal. 69 (Cal. 1889)

Opinion


79 Cal. 69 21 P. 551 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OAKLAND, Appellant, v. A. WOLFF, Respondent No. 11965 Supreme Court of California May 25, 1889

         Department Two

         79 Cal. 69 at 73.

         Original Opinion of April 27, 1889, Reported at 79 Cal. 69.

         OPINION

THE COURT 73 A petition for a rehearing having been made, the following opinion was rendered thereon, on the 25th of May, 1889:

         The Court.

         The rehearing is denied; but we are of opinion that the court did not err in allowing Wolff's testimony regarding his conversation with Bennett as to the note in suit, inasmuch as Bennett had, as witness for the plaintiff, previously testified as to it.

         The opinion heretofore filed is modified in that respect.


Summaries of

First Nat'l Bank of Oakland v. Wolff

Supreme Court of California
May 25, 1889
79 Cal. 69 (Cal. 1889)
Case details for

First Nat'l Bank of Oakland v. Wolff

Case Details

Full title:FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OAKLAND, Appellant, v. A. WOLFF, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: May 25, 1889

Citations

79 Cal. 69 (Cal. 1889)
21 P. 551

Citing Cases

Weiss v. First Savings Bank

If it is not authorized by the maker of the note it will bear the legal rate of interest, in the absence of…

Smith v. Armstrong

[12] The court admitted, over objection, testimony of a witness to a conversation had with Nathan, the…