Opinion
Argued May 5, 1898
Decided June 7, 1898
Hamilton Wallis for appellants.
Joseph A. Burr for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except BARTLETT and VANN, JJ., not voting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
First National Bank v. Wallis
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 7, 1898
156 N.Y. 663 (N.Y. 1898)
Summaries of
First National Bank v. Wallis
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 7, 1898
156 N.Y. 663 (N.Y. 1898)
Case details for
First National Bank v. Wallis
Case Details
Full title:THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK of the City of Brooklyn, Respondent, v . WILLIAM…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 7, 1898
Citations
156 N.Y. 663 (N.Y. 1898)
Citing Cases
Second Nat. Bank Of Philadelphia v. Thompson
The judgment cannot be impeached for any supposed defect or irregularity in the transaction upon which it was…
Marcus v. OtisRestatement of Conflict of Laws § 326(b). De Witt v. Walton, 9 N.Y. 571; Buffalo Catholic Institute v.…