Opinion
Argued October 6, 1890
Decided October 14, 1890
William G. Wilson for appellant.
Maurice Untermyer for respondents.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except RUGER, Ch. J., not voting.
Order affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
First National Bank of Jersey City v. Lenk
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 14, 1890
123 N.Y. 638 (N.Y. 1890)
Summaries of
First National Bank of Jersey City v. Lenk
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 14, 1890
123 N.Y. 638 (N.Y. 1890)
Case details for
First National Bank of Jersey City v. Lenk
Case Details
Full title:THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JERSEY CITY, Appellant, v . PETER LENK et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 14, 1890
Citations
123 N.Y. 638 (N.Y. 1890)
Citing Cases
Potts v. Baldwin
" The same doctrine is asserted in First National Bank of Jersey City v. Lenk (32 N.Y. St. Repr. 192) as…
Potts v. DounceThe principle of liability of debtors upon a joint contract should make that proposition sufficiently clear,…