holding that the parole board has "complete discretion in determining whether to grant parole when the denial of parole is not mandated by statute" and "the merits of parole-release decisions are not subject to judicial review"
Summary of this case from Turner v. HAWAI`I Paroling AuthorityNo. 96-1862.
October 6, 1997, OCTOBER TERM, 1997.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 101 F. 3d 1450.
holding that the parole board has "complete discretion in determining whether to grant parole when the denial of parole is not mandated by statute" and "the merits of parole-release decisions are not subject to judicial review"
Summary of this case from Turner v. HAWAI`I Paroling Authorityfinding primary liability where defendant directed employees to make false and misleading statements to the public
Summary of this case from In re Parmalat Securities LitigationFull title:FIRST JERSEY SECURITIES, INC., ET AL. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 6, 1997
By way of comparison the Second and Third Circuits have adopted the more restrictive requirement of active…
U.S. Sec. Exchange Commn. v. Verdiramo"The primary purpose of disgorgement as a remedy for violation of the securities laws is to deprive…