From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fioravanti v. Fioravanti

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Mar 29, 1956
231 F.2d 776 (D.C. Cir. 1956)

Opinion

No. 12965.

Argued March 20, 1956.

Decided March 29, 1956.

Mr. Charles H. Quimby, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Alvin L. Newmyer, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Alvin L. Newmyer, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WILBUR K. MILLER and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.


The question is whether the District Court may in its discretion reduce or cancel, at a later date, periodic installments of payments for maintenance as of the date when application for such relief is made. We re-affirm our decision in Dausuel v. Dausuel, 90 U.S.App. D.C. 275, 276, 195 F.2d 774, 775, that the court may do so. Cf. Kephart v. Kephart, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 380, 193 F.2d 677, 684, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 944, 72 S.Ct. 557, 96 L.Ed. 702; 6 A.L.R.2d 1277, 1328.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Fioravanti v. Fioravanti

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Mar 29, 1956
231 F.2d 776 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
Case details for

Fioravanti v. Fioravanti

Case Details

Full title:Mathilda FIORAVANTI, Appellant, v. Quirino FIORAVANTI, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Mar 29, 1956

Citations

231 F.2d 776 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
98 U.S. App. D.C. 23

Citing Cases

Trezevant v. Trezevant

While we agree that in this jurisdiction there can be no modification of installments of alimony or support…

Steadman v. Steadman

However, it is well-established that the court "may, in its discretion reduce or cancel at a later date,…