From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fine v. Bellefonte Underwriters Insu. Co.

U.S.
Oct 1, 1984
469 U.S. 874 (1984)

Summary

holding that ADEA plaintiffs may not recover prejudgment interest if they recover liquidated damages

Summary of this case from Hansard v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling

Opinion

No. 84-105.

October 1, 1984.


C.A. 2d Cir. Motion of Municipal Art Society of New York for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 725 F. 2d 179.


Summaries of

Fine v. Bellefonte Underwriters Insu. Co.

U.S.
Oct 1, 1984
469 U.S. 874 (1984)

holding that ADEA plaintiffs may not recover prejudgment interest if they recover liquidated damages

Summary of this case from Hansard v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling

describing "profound interests in repose"

Summary of this case from Conley v. U.S.

emphasizing the lack of a motion for continuance in rejecting right to counsel of choice claim

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Cordell

stating that a single letter to the Court asking for an extension of time to file an answer did not constitute an "appearance" for the purposes of Rule 55(b)

Summary of this case from State v. Green
Case details for

Fine v. Bellefonte Underwriters Insu. Co.

Case Details

Full title:FINE ET AL. v. BELLEFONTE UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 1, 1984

Citations

469 U.S. 874 (1984)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Cordell

"While the plain language of the [Sixth] [A]mendment simply guarantees a defendant `the Assistance of Counsel…

Starceski v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

43, 86 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); Reichman v. Bonsignore, Brignati Mazzotta, P.C., 818 F.2d 278, 281-82 (2d Cir.…