Summary
recognizing protection for filing grievances
Summary of this case from Stellmaker v. DePetrilloOpinion
No. 84-93.
October 9, 1984.
ORDERS
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 731 F. 2d 1394.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Fine v. Barry Enright Productions
U.S.
Oct 9, 1984
469 U.S. 881 (1984)
Summaries of
Fine v. Barry Enright Productions
U.S.
Oct 9, 1984
469 U.S. 881 (1984)
recognizing protection for filing grievances
Summary of this case from Stellmaker v. DePetrillonoting that Rule 804(b)'s concern for adversarial cross-examination is not present when the government has had a previous opportunity to question a witness during a grand jury hearing
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Fosterinterpreting the term "employer" under Title VII
Summary of this case from Carparts Distri. Ctr. v. Automotive Wholesaler'sCase details for
Fine v. Barry Enright Productions
Case Details
Full title:FINE v. BARRY ENRIGHT PRODUCTIONS et al
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 9, 1984
Citations
469 U.S. 881 (1984)
Citing Cases
Graham v. St., N.Y., Dept. of Civil Serv.
Graham suggests that the most appropriate means of remedying the State's alleged violation of title VII is to…
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. LyngAccordingly, as stated preliminarily in the 1985 Memorandum, application of this standard to the undisputed…