From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Filler v. Cornell University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1989
147 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 21, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Venue motions are directed to the discretion of the trial court. Absent a clearly improvident exercise of discretion, a determination of a motion to change venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) will not be disturbed on appeal. Under the circumstances presented here, we cannot say that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the motion to change venue from Richmond County to Tompkins County. Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Filler v. Cornell University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1989
147 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Filler v. Cornell University

Case Details

Full title:DENISE FILLER, Respondent, v. CORNELL UNIVERSITY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Woloch v. Olthof Funeral Home, Inc.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Tioga County (Rose, J.). In rejecting defendants' contention that their motion…

Weisemann v. Davison

Similarly, the vague reference in counsel's affirmation to the presence of medical witnesses in Warren County…