From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fike v. Fike

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 424 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided February 1st, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, whose opinion is reported in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 485.

Messrs. McCarter English, for the respondent.

Mr. Robert Newton Crane, for the appellant.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Fike v. Fike

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 424 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Fike v. Fike

Case Details

Full title:ROSE E. FIKE, respondent, v. ROY E. FIKE, appellant

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 424 (N.J. 1926)

Citing Cases

Bendler v. Bendler

Wood v.Chetwood, 44 N.J. Eq. 64 ( Ch. 1888); affirmed, 45 N.J. Eq. 369 ( E. A. 1889); Healey v. Healey, 48…

Wolff v. Wolff

Such transactions are jealously scrutinized in equity to prevent the wife from being overreached, defrauded…