From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fields v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jul 3, 2013
511 F. App'x 600 (8th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-3827

07-03-2013

Mitchell D. Fields Plaintiff - Appellant v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Defendant - Appellee


Appeal from United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis


[Unpublished]

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Mitchell D. Fields appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in this diversity employment-discrimination action under the Missouri Human Rights Act. Fields offers no valid basis, and we find none, for overturning the district court's well-reasoned decision. See Porter v. City of Lake Lotawana, 651 F.3d 894, 897-98 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment, viewing record in light most favorable to non-movant); Melford Olsen Honey, Inc. v. Adee, 452 F.3d 956, 966 (8th Cir. 2006) (reviewing de novo district court's application of state law). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Claims, allegations, and arguments may not be advanced for first time on appeal. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004).
--------


Summaries of

Fields v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jul 3, 2013
511 F. App'x 600 (8th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Fields v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Mitchell D. Fields Plaintiff - Appellant v. United Parcel Service, Inc…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jul 3, 2013

Citations

511 F. App'x 600 (8th Cir. 2013)