Opinion
No. 3D20-0051
06-23-2021
Violette FIELDS, etc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
Eaton & Wolk, PL, and Douglas F. Eaton, for appellant/cross-appellee. King & Spalding LLP, and Scott M. Edson (Washington, DC); Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, and Geoffrey J. Michael (Washington, DC), for appellees/cross-appellants.
Eaton & Wolk, PL, and Douglas F. Eaton, for appellant/cross-appellee.
King & Spalding LLP, and Scott M. Edson (Washington, DC); Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, and Geoffrey J. Michael (Washington, DC), for appellees/cross-appellants.
Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Companioni v. City of Tampa, 51 So. 3d 452, 454 (Fla. 2010) (holding that absent a motion for a mistrial made contemporaneously with an objection, the conduct is subject to fundamental error analysis); see also Murphy v. Int'l Robotic Sys., Inc., 766 So. 2d 1010, 1028-31 (Fla. 2000) (explaining that to establish fundamental error, the complained-of issue must be improper, harmful, incurable, and the party "must also establish that the argument so damaged the fairness of the trial that the public's interest in our system of justice requires a new trial").