From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fields v. Lucille Fields

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 17, 2011
82 A.D.3d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

Nos. 4547, 4547A, 4547B.

March 17, 2011.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Matthew F. Cooper, J.), entered January 14, 2010, awarding defendant the principal amount of $20,000 plus interest and fees, pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about December 9, 2009, and order, same court (Deborah A. Kaplan, J.), entered September 9, 2009, which granted defendant's application for appellate counsel fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeals from aforesaid orders unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Arnold Davis, New York, for appellant.

Hoffman, Polland Furman, PLLC, New York (Elliot R. Polland of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Acosta, Richter and Román, JJ.


When plaintiff appealed the judgment of divorce and a subsequent judgment to this Court ( see 65 AD3d 297, aff'd 15 NY3d 158), he had not yet paid defendant the distributive award and therefore still controlled the majority of the marital estate. Accordingly, since plaintiff's respective financial position gave him a distinct advantage over defendant, the court providently exercised its discretion in directing him to pay her appellate counsel fees ( see Silverman v Silverman, 304 AD2d 41, 48-49).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Fields v. Lucille Fields

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 17, 2011
82 A.D.3d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Fields v. Lucille Fields

Case Details

Full title:RONALD FIELDS, Appellant, v. LUCILLE FIELDS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 17, 2011

Citations

82 A.D.3d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1930
918 N.Y.S.2d 713

Citing Cases

Franco v. Franco

Here, there is no basis to disturb the Supreme Court's determinations regarding the equitable distribution of…

Curley v. Curley

Of the numerous arguments advanced by the husband, the only one that is properly before us is whether Supreme…