From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Field v. Burr

Supreme Court of California,Department Two
Jun 25, 1900
129 Cal. 44 (Cal. 1900)

Opinion

L.A. No. 650.

June 25, 1900.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lucien Shaw, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Mulford Pollard, for Appellant.

W.J. Variel, for Defendant.

E.E. Powers, for Intervenor and Respondent.


Appeal from a judgment for intervenor in a suit for the recovery of personal property levied upon by defendant, as sheriff, under attachment in favor of plaintiff against third party.

The findings are unusually full and explicit, but in the conclusions of law the word "plaintiff" is inadvertently used for "intervenor," which is the ground urged for reversal. (Dougherty v. Ward, 89 Cal. 81.)

We recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

Gray, C., and Haynes, C., concurred.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed.

McFarland, J., Temple, J., Henshaw, J.


Summaries of

Field v. Burr

Supreme Court of California,Department Two
Jun 25, 1900
129 Cal. 44 (Cal. 1900)
Case details for

Field v. Burr

Case Details

Full title:D.W. FIELD, Appellant, v. JOHN BURR, Sheriff, etc., Defendant. CAROLINE…

Court:Supreme Court of California,Department Two

Date published: Jun 25, 1900

Citations

129 Cal. 44 (Cal. 1900)
61 P. 665

Citing Cases

Cummings v. Columbia Pictures Corp.

Having set forth sufficient to show beyond controversy that the reference to the exercise of option "A" in…