From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fiederlein v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 30, 1982
56 N.Y.2d 573 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Argued February 8, 1982

Decided March 30, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ALFRED M. ASCIONE, J.

Robert G. Harley for appellant.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Bernard Abel of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The evidence was insufficient to form the basis for a jury award of damages for conscious pain and suffering. Mere conjecture, surmise or speculation is not enough to sustain a claim for damages. There was no direct proof of the cause of the decedent's death and, more importantly, there was no proof of conscious pain and suffering in connection with that death. Moreover, we find the record to be insufficient to support a finding that decedent experienced increased pain while at the hospital as a proximate result of the treatment which he received.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Fiederlein v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 30, 1982
56 N.Y.2d 573 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Fiederlein v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CONSTANTINA FIEDERLEIN, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 30, 1982

Citations

56 N.Y.2d 573 (N.Y. 1982)
450 N.Y.S.2d 181
435 N.E.2d 398

Citing Cases

Zamora v. Morphix Co.

Further, it is well established that "[m]ere conjecture, surmise or speculation is not enough to sustain a…

Rivera v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.

Pursuant to this standard, "an award for future medical expenses may not be based upon mere speculation."…