From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fieder v. Terstiege

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 1948
273 App. Div. 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

April 26, 1948.

Present — Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.


In an action to restrain interference with appellants' use and enjoyment of certain land designated as "park" and "beach" on a filed map, to which map appellants' deeds make reference, judgment in favor of defendants, dismissing the complaint on the merits, after trial by the court without a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Fieder v. Terstiege

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 1948
273 App. Div. 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Fieder v. Terstiege

Case Details

Full title:JANET D. FIEDER et al., Appellants, v. HELEN TERSTIEGE et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 26, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Wilkinson v. Nassau Shores

( Matter of City of New York [ Northern Blvd.], 258 N.Y. 136, 147; Erit Realty Corp. v. Sea Gate Assn., 259…

Wash-O-Matic Laundry Co. v. 621 Lefferts Ave. Corp.

Since a license confers no interest or estate in land it does not create a burden on or run with the land (…