From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fiallos v. Vin's Crown Realty Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 2010
70 A.D.3d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-00397.

February 2, 2010.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Vin's Crown Realty Associates appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated December 10, 2008, as denied those branches of its motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging common-law negligence and a violation of Labor Law § 200 insofar as asserted against it.

Lester Schwab Katz Dwyer, LLP (Gannon, Rosenfarb Moskowitz, New York, N.Y. [Jennifer B. Ettenger and Peter J. Gannon], of counsel), for appellant.

Brecher Fishman Pasternack Walsh Tilker Ziegler P.C. (Diamond Diamond, LLC, New York, N.Y. [Stuart Diamond], of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Santucci, J.P., Balkin, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and those branches of the appellant's motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging common-law negligence and a violation of Labor Law § 200 insofar as asserted against it are granted.

The defendant Vin's Crown Realty Associates (hereinafter the appellant) satisfied its prima facie burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the plaintiff was injured, not by a dangerous condition, but by the methods or materials of his work, and that it did not have the authority to supervise or control the performance of his work ( see Ortega v Puccia, 57 AD3d 54, 61-63; Kwang Ho Kim v D W Shin Realty Corp., 47 AD3d 616, 620; Ford v Caliendo Sons, 305 AD2d 368, 369). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Kwang Ho Kim v D W Shin Realty Corp., 47 AD3d at 620). Accordingly, the appellant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging common-law negligence and a violation of Labor Law § 200 insofar as asserted against it.

[Prior Case History: 22 Misc 3d 1122(A), 2008 NY Slip Op 52657(U).]


Summaries of

Fiallos v. Vin's Crown Realty Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 2010
70 A.D.3d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Fiallos v. Vin's Crown Realty Associates

Case Details

Full title:HENRY FIALLOS, Respondent, v. VIN'S CROWN REALTY ASSOCIATES, Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 2010

Citations

70 A.D.3d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 804
892 N.Y.S.2d 899

Citing Cases

Casanova v. Constr. By Design N.Y. LLC

The mere presence of a stove with a pilot light did not constitute a defective condition on the premises.…

Casanova v. Constr. by Design N.Y. LLC

The mere presence of a stove with a pilot light did not constitute a defective condition on the premises.…