From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

F.I. DU PONT, GLORE FORGAN CO. v. SILLIMAN

Supreme Court of Delaware
Sep 6, 1973
310 A.2d 128 (Del. 1973)

Summary

equating "entity" status of a partnership to being considered a "jural person"

Summary of this case from United States v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC

Opinion

September 6, 1973.

Upon appeal from Superior Court. Affirmed.

Januar D. Bove, Jr. and Arthur G. Connolly, Jr., of Connolly, Bove Lodge, Wilmington, and Peter Gruenberger, James W. Quinn and Robert Weiner of Weil, Gotshal Manges, New York City, for defendant below, appellant.

Henry N. Herndon, Jr. and Edward M. McNally, of Morris, James, Hitchens Williams, Wilmington, for plaintiff below, appellee.

Before HERRMANN, C.J., and CAREY and DUFFY, JJ.


For the reasons stated in the careful opinion below (Del.Super., 302 A.2d 327), we agree that the plaintiff may maintain this action against F.I. duPont, Glore Forgan Company, a limited partnership, in its common name as a partnership entity, without joinder of individual partners.

It is to be noted that any doubt as to the meaning of 10 Del. C. § 3904 in this regard has now been removed by the July 1, 1973 amendment thereto, ___ Del.L.Ch. ___.

10 Del. C. § 3904, as amended, provides:

"§ 3904. Suits and Judgments by and Against Unincorporated Associations
"An unincorporated association of persons, including a partnership, using a common name may sue and be sued in such common name and a judgment recovered therein shall be a lien like other judgments, and may be executed upon by levy, seizure and sale of the personal and real estate of such association, and also that of the persons composing such association in the same manner with respect to them as if they had been made parties defendant by their individual names. Satisfaction thereof may also be obtained by attachment process."

The judgment below is affirmed.


Summaries of

F.I. DU PONT, GLORE FORGAN CO. v. SILLIMAN

Supreme Court of Delaware
Sep 6, 1973
310 A.2d 128 (Del. 1973)

equating "entity" status of a partnership to being considered a "jural person"

Summary of this case from United States v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Case details for

F.I. DU PONT, GLORE FORGAN CO. v. SILLIMAN

Case Details

Full title:F.I. Du PONT, GLORE FORGAN COMPANY, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Mariana…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Sep 6, 1973

Citations

310 A.2d 128 (Del. 1973)

Citing Cases

United States v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC

Super. 1972), aff'd sub nom. F.I. Du Pont, Glore Forgan & Co. v. Silliman , 310 A.2d 128 (Del. 1973)…

Bechtel v. Robinson

The purpose of a so-called " common name statute" such as § 3101 is " to protect the residents of the State…