From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fhagen v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 13, 1971
36 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Opinion

May 13, 1971


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 28, 1971, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of striking therefrom that part of the last decretal paragraph which dismisses the complaint, and substituting therefor a provision declaring that the emergency and medical admission sections of the Mental Hygiene Law (§ 78, subd. 1 and § 72, subd. 1) are constitutional and valid; and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Since this was an action for declaratory judgment, it was error, in granting summary judgment to defendants, to direct dismissal of the complaint, and a declaration as to the constitutionality of the sections attacked should have been made. (See Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317; New York Sporting Arms Assn. v. City of New York, 31 A.D.2d 793, and cases cited therein.

Concur — Capozzoli, J.P., Nunez, Kupferman, Steuer and Eager, JJ. [ 65 Misc.2d 163.]


Summaries of

Fhagen v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 13, 1971
36 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)
Case details for

Fhagen v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL FHAGEN et al., Appellants, v. ALAN D. MILLER, Individually and as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 13, 1971

Citations

36 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Citing Cases

Todaro v. N.Y. City Employees' Retirement Sys

The court at Special Term, in granting summary judgment, should have made a declaration of the rights of the…

Sweeney v. Cannon

However, since this is an action for a declaratory judgment, that court, instead of dismissing the complaint,…