From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferrucci v. Town of Middlebury

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 18, 2011
302 Conn. 944 (Conn. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-18

STATE of Connecticut v. Tyrone BROWN.

G. Douglas Nash, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


G. Douglas Nash, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn.App. 275, 26 A.3d 674, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant's refusal to answer questions after he was given Miranda warnings was admissible?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Ferrucci v. Town of Middlebury

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 18, 2011
302 Conn. 944 (Conn. 2011)
Case details for

Ferrucci v. Town of Middlebury

Case Details

Full title:Stephen R. FERRUCCI III v. TOWN OF MIDDLEBURY et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

302 Conn. 944 (Conn. 2011)
31 A.3d 382

Citing Cases

MTM Family, Ltd. P'ship v. City of Bridgeport

" It is axiomatic that to maintain such a claim, it is not enough that a promise was made; reasonable…

Civic Mind, LLC v. City of Hartford

109 Conn.App. 572, 583 n.7, 953 A.2d 656, cert. denied, 289 Conn. 934, 958 A.2d 1244.131 Conn.App. 289,…