From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferreira v. New York Daily News

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 31, 2009
08-CV-1520 (RRM) (MDG) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2009)

Opinion

08-CV-1520 (RRM) (MDG).

March 31, 2009


ORDER


By Motion filed May 9, 2008, Plaintiff moved to remand this action to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447. By Order entered June 4, 2008, this Court referred that motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge, the Honorable Marilyn D. Go, for a Report and Recommendation. On March 16, 2009, Judge Go issued a Report and Recommendation (the "R R") that Plaintiff's motion to remand be denied. Judge Go reminded the parties that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), any objection to the R R was due by March 30, 2009. Neither party has filed any objection.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R R for clear error and, finding none, concurs with the R R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to remand is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ferreira v. New York Daily News

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 31, 2009
08-CV-1520 (RRM) (MDG) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2009)
Case details for

Ferreira v. New York Daily News

Case Details

Full title:REGINO FERREIRA, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK DAILY NEWS, PETE DONOHUE, THE CITY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Mar 31, 2009

Citations

08-CV-1520 (RRM) (MDG) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2009)

Citing Cases

Riano v. Town of Schroeppel

Nevertheless, a defendant may consent to removal through counsel. See Ferreira v. New York Daily News, No.…

Nasca v. Bytedance, Ltd.

, the burden rests with the removing party (defendant) to establish that federal subject matter jurisdiction…