From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fernandez v. Wind Chime Props., L.P.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2020
Case No. CV 18-10625-DMG (KSx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. CV 18-10625-DMG (KSx)

07-06-2020

ANTONIO FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. WIND CHIME PROPERTIES, L.P., et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

The Court having granted the motion for summary judgment of Defendants Wind Chime Properties, L.P. and White Spring Associates, Inc. on the basis of mootness, and denied Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez's motion for summary judgment, by Order dated July 6, 2020 [Doc. # 60],

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff as to the Americans with Disabilities Act claim. The Unruh Act claim is dismissed without prejudice. DATED: July 6, 2020

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fernandez v. Wind Chime Props., L.P.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2020
Case No. CV 18-10625-DMG (KSx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Fernandez v. Wind Chime Props., L.P.

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. WIND CHIME PROPERTIES, L.P., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 6, 2020

Citations

Case No. CV 18-10625-DMG (KSx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2020)

Citing Cases

Scherer v. Simco Fin. Servs.

Here, however, it is undisputed that the Store has permanently closed, which renders Plaintiff's ADA claim…