From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fenn v. Fenn

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland County
Jul 30, 1931
156 A. 927 (Me. 1931)

Opinion

Decided July 30, 1931.


This report of this cause in equity, brought to obtain a construction of the will of William H. Fenn, late of Portland, Maine, deceased, must be discharged. Of the thirty-seven defendants, individual and representative, sixteen only appear, answer and agree to this report. Twenty-one defendants failed to appear, the bill is taken pro confesso against them and the cause reported without their agreement.

This Law Court has jurisdiction to determine causes in equity certified on report only when the presiding Justice is of opinion, and so certifies, that a question of law is involved of sufficient importance or doubt to justify the same, and the parties agree thereto. R. S., Chap. 91, Sec. 56; Baker v. Johnson, 41 Me. 15; Whittemore v. Russell, 78 Me. 337. Defendants in default in an equity action under a decree pro confesso are still parties and have some rights. Unless all parties agree to a report of the cause in which they are joined, we think it is the duty of the sitting Justice to hear the evidence and make such rules, orders or decrees thereon as the law of the case requires. Under this procedure, any party aggrieved has the right of exception and appeal reserved to him and the rights of all other parties are left unimpaired. Report discharged. George C. Otto and Frederick R. Dyer, for plaintiff. John F. Dana, Eugene L. Bodge, John B. Kehoe, for defendants.


Summaries of

Fenn v. Fenn

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland County
Jul 30, 1931
156 A. 927 (Me. 1931)
Case details for

Fenn v. Fenn

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS L. FENN vs. WILLIAM H. FENN, EDWARD D. NOYES, HORACE MANNING…

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland County

Date published: Jul 30, 1931

Citations

156 A. 927 (Me. 1931)
156 A. 927

Citing Cases

Lindsey v. County of Cumberland

Hand, Adm'r v. Nickerson, 148 Me. 465, 95 A.2d 813 (1953). The language `all parties appearing' in Rule 72(a)…

Inhabitants of Lebanon v. Shapleigh

The action of the intervenors in no way binds the defendants nor impairs their rights. In Fenn v. Fenn, 130…