From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Felix v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 31, 1990
566 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-00645.

August 31, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lee County, R. Wallace Pack, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Jennifer Y. Fogle, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm the conviction of Donald Felix for possession of cocaine, a third-degree felony. We write only to note that the officer exceeded the scope of a pat-down when he turned Felix's pockets inside out and found one piece of rock cocaine. See Walker v. State, 514 So.2d 1149, 1151 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Although that one rock of cocaine should have been suppressed, the trial court's denial of the motion to suppress as to that rock was harmless error because the officer seized three other rocks of cocaine which were in the officer's plain view during the course of a lawful intrusion. As to those rocks, the denial of the motion to suppress was proper.

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., and LUTEN, CLAIRE K., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Felix v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 31, 1990
566 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Felix v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD FELIX, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 31, 1990

Citations

566 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Smallwood v. State

The erroneous admission of evidence obtained from an improper search is subject to a harmless error analysis.…

Hines v. State

This search was unreasonable and illegal. Felix v. State, 566 So.2d 342 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (officer exceeded…