From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acholonu v. Hobbs

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 1, 2014
134 So. 3d 509 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 1D14–0236.

2014-04-1

Felix N. ACHOLONU, M.D., and North Florida Obstetrical & Gynocological Associates, P.A., Petitioners, v. Heike HOBBS and Maurice Hobbs, Respondents.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction. Michael R. D'Lugo of Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondents.


Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.
Michael R. D'Lugo of Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondents.
PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Hedrick v. State, 6 So.3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that a motion to disqualify is not deemed automatically granted by operation of the rule when the movant has failed to serve the judge as required by rule 2.330(c)). LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Acholonu v. Hobbs

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 1, 2014
134 So. 3d 509 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Acholonu v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:Felix N. ACHOLONU, M.D., and North Florida Obstetrical & Gynocological…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Apr 1, 2014

Citations

134 So. 3d 509 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)