From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feintuch v. Grella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 7, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendant's motion papers made out a prima facie case for summary judgment. The plaintiffs submitted, in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, the affirmations of a chiropractor, and annexed unsworn reports. The affirmations of a chiropractor do not constitute competent evidence (see, CPLR 2106). In any case, the affirmations contained conclusory assertions which were insufficient to defeat the defendant's motion for summary judgment. Thompson, J.P., Miller, O'Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Feintuch v. Grella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Feintuch v. Grella

Case Details

Full title:ERIC FEINTUCH et al., Respondents, v. DENNIS GRELLA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 593

Citing Cases

Martinez v. Snorac, Inc.

However, in order to be sufficient to establish a prima facie case of serious physical injury the affirmation…

Chauca v. Legac

However, in order to be sufficient to establish a prima facie case of serious physical injury the affirmation…