From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feinberg v. Feinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1910
140 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

November, 1910.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., Clarke, Scott, Miller and Dowling, JJ.


This is an action brought to annual a marriage. After the motion had been made for an additional counsel fee and the court had announced that the motion would be granted, the plaintiff moved for leave to discontinue, which order was denied, with leave, however, to the plaintiff to renew said motion after the decision on the appeal from the order granting the additional counsel fee. We think the order appealed from was entirely proper under the circumstances, but as we have determined the appeal from the order granting the additional counsel fee by a decision handed down herewith (See Feinberg v. Feinberg, No. 1, ante, p. 924), we think this motion for leave to discontinue should be disposed of at the same time. An order may be entered, therefore, reversing the order appealed from and granting leave to discontinue upon payment of $250 additional counsel fee heretofore allowed, and taxable costs and disbursements of the action, without costs to either party upon this appeal.


Order reversed and motion granted upon terms stated in opinion, without costs.


Summaries of

Feinberg v. Feinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1910
140 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

Feinberg v. Feinberg

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN FEINBERG, Appellant, v . FELLA FEINBERG, Sued as "FELLA HOCHMAN,…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1910

Citations

140 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
125 N.Y.S. 384

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Hartwell

The writ of mandamus should be refused because petitioner has an adequate remedy by appeal from a final…