From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fedziuk v. Conroy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 13, 1993
199 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 13, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There are questions of fact as to whether the plaintiff had an interest in the real property in question prior to the defendant's alleged promise to convey it to her sufficient for the imposition of a constructive trust, and thus the court did not err in denying the defendant's motion for summary judgment (see, Crown Realty Co. v Crown Hgts. Jewish Community Council, 175 A.D.2d 151; Gottlieb v Gottlieb, 166 A.D.2d 413; Washington v Defense, 149 A.D.2d 697; Lester v Zommer, 147 A.D.2d 340).

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Eiber, O'Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fedziuk v. Conroy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 13, 1993
199 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Fedziuk v. Conroy

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY FEDZIUK, Respondent, v. THOMAS CONROY, Appellant. (And Another…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
606 N.Y.S.2d 1005

Citing Cases

Old Republic Nation Title v. Cardinal Abstract

The Supreme Court should have granted the motion of the defendants H.R.C. Holding Corp. and Joseph Paradelo…