stating that although the challenged notices were not "models of clarity and draftsmanship and could be easily improved," due process only demanded that the plaintiffs be informed of their opportunity to object and be supplied with enough information for them to adequately prepare for this opportunity
Summary of this case from Sterling v. U.S.Nos. 80-2222, 81-218.
October 13, 1981
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 643 F. 2d 1229.
stating that although the challenged notices were not "models of clarity and draftsmanship and could be easily improved," due process only demanded that the plaintiffs be informed of their opportunity to object and be supplied with enough information for them to adequately prepare for this opportunity
Summary of this case from Sterling v. U.S.Full title:FEDDERS CORP. ET AL. v. CHRYSLER CORP. ET AL.; and CHRYSLER CORP. v…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 13, 1981
Michigan Nat. Bank, 888 F.2d at 466; Serras, 875 F.2d at 1214. But cf. Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp., 643…
State v. ClellandThe line is drawn by the laws of logic. If there is an experience of logical probability that an ultimate…