From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fed. Land Bank v. Kimbriel

Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division B
Oct 14, 1935
163 So. 501 (Miss. 1935)

Opinion

No. 31819.

October 14, 1935.

APPEAL AND ERROR.

Plaintiff held not entitled to appeal from interlocutory decree sustaining demurrer to complaint filed by four of seven defendants where no decree had been taken against remaining three defendants.

APPEAL from the chancery court of Webster county; HON. JAS. A. FINLEY, Chancellor.

Robert E. Nason, of Ackerman, for appellant.

Frank A. Critz, of West Point, and T.W. Scott, of Eupora, for appellees.

Briefs of counsel not found.


There are seven defendants to the bill of complaint in this case. Two of them failed to answer or demur, but no decree was taken against them. One of the defendants answered, and the answer remains pending. The other four defendants filed a special demurrer interposing the statute of limitations, which demurrer was sustained; and from the order sustaining the demurrer, an interlocutory appeal to this court was attempted to be granted.

In Liberty Trust Co. v. Planters' Bank, 155 Miss. 721, 124 So. 341, we expressly held that when no final decree has been taken as to all the other defendants, no interlocutory appeal is to be allowed to some of the defendants; and we therein pointed out the reasons for the rule, one among which reasons is that if the rule were otherwise, some of the parties would have to wait in the chancery court as to their case, while others would litigate their part of the case on appeal. No such a situation was contemplated by the statute; is not within either its letter or its purpose.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Fed. Land Bank v. Kimbriel

Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division B
Oct 14, 1935
163 So. 501 (Miss. 1935)
Case details for

Fed. Land Bank v. Kimbriel

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL LAND BANK v. KIMBRIEL et al

Court:Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division B

Date published: Oct 14, 1935

Citations

163 So. 501 (Miss. 1935)
163 So. 501

Citing Cases

Wirtz et al. v. Gordon

In Moore v. White, 161 Miss. 390, 137 So. 99, we held that where an important point was attempted to be…

Stanley v. Allstate Ins. Co.

See: Cotton v. Veterans Cab Company, Inc., 344 So.2d 730 (Miss. 1977), and Federal Land Bank v. Kimbriel, 174…