From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FCM v. Washington Mutual Bank

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Dec 21, 2007
Civil Case No. 07-1298-AS (D. Or. Dec. 21, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 07-1298-AS.

December 21, 2007

Alan A. Lave, Portland, Oregon, Attorney for Plaintiff.

Cody M. Weston, David P.R. Symes, Perkins Coie, LLP, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Defendants.


ORDER


The Honorable Donald C. Ashmanskas, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on November 28, 2007. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas' Findings and Recommendation (#18).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Lindley (#4) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (#8) is DENIED.


Summaries of

FCM v. Washington Mutual Bank

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Dec 21, 2007
Civil Case No. 07-1298-AS (D. Or. Dec. 21, 2007)
Case details for

FCM v. Washington Mutual Bank

Case Details

Full title:FCM, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, a Washington corporation; and…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Dec 21, 2007

Citations

Civil Case No. 07-1298-AS (D. Or. Dec. 21, 2007)

Citing Cases

Conroy v. Mewshaw

Defendants' interpretation of Anderson relies on Biggs v. City of St. Paul, 2020 WL 2744092 (D. Or. May 5,…

Biggs v. City of St. Paul

In addition, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant had a duty not to reveal private or confidential…