From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faux ex rel. J.F. v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 16, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1377 (M.D. Pa. May. 16, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1377

05-16-2018

AMANDA FAUX, o/b/o, J.F., Plaintiff v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2018, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 13) of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson, recommending that the court vacate the decision of the administrative law judge denying the application of plaintiff Amanda Faux ("Faux"), on behalf of her minor child, J.F., for child disability benefits, and remand this matter for further proceedings, wherein Judge Carlson opines that the administrative law judge's decision is not "supported by substantial evidence," 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and it appearing that neither Faux nor the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") object to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and that the Commissioner has expressly waived the opportunity to do so, (see Doc. 14), and the court noting that failure to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report," Henderson, 812 F.2d at 878; see also Taylor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following review of the record, the court in agreement with Judge Carlson's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 13) of Magistrate Judge Carlson is ADOPTED.

2. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of plaintiff Amanda Faux ("Faux"), on behalf of her minor child, J.F., and against the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") as set forth in the following paragraph.

3. The Commissioner's decision is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner with instructions to conduct a new administrative hearing, develop the record fully, and evaluate the evidence appropriately in accordance with this order and the report (Doc. 13) of Magistrate Judge Carlson.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Faux ex rel. J.F. v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 16, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1377 (M.D. Pa. May. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Faux ex rel. J.F. v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:AMANDA FAUX, o/b/o, J.F., Plaintiff v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 16, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1377 (M.D. Pa. May. 16, 2018)

Citing Cases

Faux v. Kijakazi

After the Appeals Council denied her request for review, id. at 1, Faux filed a complaint in this Court, and…