From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fatsis v. 360 Clinton Ave. Tenants Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 2000
272 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 30, 2000

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs are not obligated to pay an attorney's fee to the defendant 360 Clinton Avenue Tenants Corp. in the principal sum of $8,046.94, representing the amount the plaintiffs paid into an escrow account, and, in effect, that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover the money held in escrow, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), entered February 24, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendant 360 Clinton Avenue Tenants Corp. and against them in the principal sum of $8,046.94.

Before: Joy, J.P. Goldstein, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and it is declared that the plaintiffs are not obligated to pay the defendant 360 Clinton Avenue Tenants Corp. an attorney's fee in the principal sum of $8,046.94, and that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover the money held in escrow.

In general, only a prevailing party is entitled to recover an attorney's fee. To be considered a prevailing party, a party must be successful with respect to the central relief sought ( see, Nestor v. McDowell, 81 N.Y.2d 410, 415-416; 25 E. 83 Corp. v. 83rd St. Assocs., 213 A.D.2d 269). The defendant 360 Clinton Avenue Tenants Corp. was not the prevailing party in the underlying summary proceeding in this case. Accordingly, the plaintiffs are not obligated to pay that defendant an attorney's fee, and the plaintiffs are entitled to recover the money held in escrow.

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Fatsis v. 360 Clinton Ave. Tenants Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 2000
272 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Fatsis v. 360 Clinton Ave. Tenants Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LAMPROS FATSIS et al., Appellants, v. 360 CLINTON AVENUE TENANTS CORP. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 30, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 421

Citing Cases

Village of Hempstead v. Taliercio

It is undisputed that the plaintiff's sole purpose in making its motion, in effect, for leave to substitute…

Russell Place Assocs., L.P. v. Hernandez

. It is well settled that only a prevailing party is entitled to recover attorney's fees and that, to be…